Xano vs Hasura: Vilket No-Code eller Low-Code Backend?
Xano and Hasura both let you build APIs on top of a database without writing a full server. But they serve different audiences and use cases.
Jämförelse: Xano vs Hasura
| Kriterium | Xano | Hasura |
|---|---|---|
| API Type | REST API (visual builder) | GraphQL + REST (auto-generated) |
| Business Logic | Visual function stacks | Actions (custom code required) |
| Database | Managed PostgreSQL | Connect your own PostgreSQL |
| Auth | Built-in user auth | JWT-based (configure yourself) |
| No-Code Integration | Native WeWeb + FlutterFlow connectors | Manual API configuration |
| Realtime | Via webhooks | Native GraphQL subscriptions |
| Developer Required | No | Yes (GraphQL schema, actions) |
| Pricing | From $85/mo (all-in) | From $0 (self-host) / $249/mo cloud |
Vårt omdöme
Xano is built for the no-code ecosystem. Its visual function builder, native connectors for WeWeb and FlutterFlow, and built-in auth make it the best backend for no-code stacks.
Hasura is for developer teams who want to auto-generate a GraphQL API from their existing PostgreSQL database. It's powerful but assumes developer resources to configure actions and permissions properly.
For no-code and low-code projects, Xano wins easily. For developer teams wanting GraphQL on existing Postgres, Hasura is compelling.
Behöver du hjälp att välja?
Våra experter har byggt 50+ projekt med dessa verktyg. Beskriv ditt projekt så rekommenderar vi rätt stack.
Prata med en expert →