Supabase vs PlanetScale: Vilken Databas ska du välja?
Supabase and PlanetScale both offer managed serverless databases. But they serve very different architectural needs.
Jämförelse: Supabase vs PlanetScale
| Kriterium | Supabase | PlanetScale |
|---|---|---|
| Database Engine | PostgreSQL | MySQL (Vitess) |
| Auth | Built-in auth (email, OAuth, SSO) | None — bring your own |
| Realtime | WebSocket subscriptions | None |
| Storage | S3-compatible file storage | None |
| Branching | Not available | Database branching (standout feature) |
| No-Code Integration | Native (WeWeb, FlutterFlow) | Via external API/ORM only |
| Scale | To millions of rows | Designed for extreme horizontal scale |
| Free Tier | 500MB, 2 projects | 10GB, 1 database (discontinued free tier) |
Vårt omdöme
Supabase gives you a complete backend platform: database, auth, storage, realtime, edge functions. For startups building no-code or full-stack apps, it's the single best choice.
PlanetScale is designed for teams that need MySQL at extreme horizontal scale — think millions of database writes per second. It's what you use when you've outgrown traditional database scaling, not when you're starting out.
For startups and scale-ups building no-code apps, Supabase. PlanetScale is for later-stage infrastructure engineers solving specific scale problems.
Behöver du hjälp att välja?
Våra experter har byggt 50+ projekt med dessa verktyg. Beskriv ditt projekt så rekommenderar vi rätt stack.
Prata med en expert →